Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S et al. ; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aid: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006;333:417–419.
Harper JC, Hammarberg K, Simopoulou M, Koert E, Pedro J, Massin N, Fincham A, Balen A; on behalf of the International Fertility Education Initiative. The International Fertility Education Initiative: research and action to improve fertility awareness. Hum Reprod Open 2021;2021:hoab031.
Kariman N, Hashemi SSB, Ghanbari S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Alimoradi Z, Fakari FR. The effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on childbearing intentions in women: A quasi-experimental study. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9.
Koert E, Sylvest R, Vittrup I, Hvidman H, Birch Petersen K, Boivin J, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L. Women’s perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling clinic in Denmark. Hum Reprod open 2020;2020:hoaa036.
Mertes H, Harper J, Boivin J, Ekstrand Ragnar M, Grace B, Moura-Ramos M, Rautakallio-Hokkanen S, Simopoulou M, Hammarberg K; International Reproductive Health Education Collaboration Irhec. Stimulating fertility awareness: the importance of getting the language right. Hum Reprod Open 2023;2023:hoad009.
Ospina-Pinillos L, Davenport TA, Ricci CS, Milton AC, Scott EM, Hickie IB. Developing a mental health eClinic to improve access to and quality of mental health care for young people: using participatory design as research methodologies. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e188.
Packer C, Ridgeway K, Lenzi R, González-Calvo L, Moon TD, Green AF, Burke HM. Hope, self-efficacy, and crushed dreams: Exploring how adolescent girls’ future aspirations relate to marriage and childbearing in rural Mozambique. J Adolesc Res 2020;35:579–604.
Pedro J, Brandão T, Fernandes J, Barros A, Xavier P, Schmidt L, Costa ME, Martins MV. Perceived threat of infertility and women’s intention to anticipate childbearing: The mediating role of personally perceived barriers and facilitators. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2021;28:457–467.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021;374:n2061.
Teixeira PJ, Marques MM, Silva MN, Brunet J, Duda JL, Haerens L, La Guardia J, Lindwall M, Lonsdale C, Markland D. A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts. Motiv Sci 2020;6:438.
Vaisson G, Provencher T, Dugas M, Trottier M-E, Chipenda Dansokho S, Colquhoun H, Fagerlin A, Giguere AM, Hakim H, Haslett L. User involvement in the design and development of patient decision aids and other personal health tools: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2021;41:261–274.
Volk RJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13 Suppl 2 (Suppl 2):S1.
Wyns C, De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka M, Motrenko T, Smeenk J, Bergh C, Tandler-Schneider A, Rugescu I, Vidakovic S. O-150 Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Europe 2019 and development of a strategy of vigilance Preliminary results generated from European registers by the ESHRE EIM consortium. Hum Reprod 2022;37:deac105.056.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Oxford University Press uses cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By selecting ‘accept all’ you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. More information can be found in our Cookie Policy.
The Fertility Guide from Balance Fertility is your definitive guide to help you on your fertility journey. It provides reliable, evidence-based information on all aspects of reproductive health for men and women. The Fertility Guide helps you to optimise your health, achieve your goals for a family and navigate any treatment you may need.
Fertility Fundamentals lays the foundations for understanding your reproductive health and empowers you to take control of your wellbeing. Reliable scientific information underpins everything we do and helps you go forward with confidence during your fertility journey.
The Health and Wellbeing guide explains the link between reproductive health and general health and wellbeing. It covers how everyday habits and behaviours may impact fertility, hormones and menstrual health, and why these things are especially important when planning a pregnancy. This includes looking after your mental health and emotional wellbeing too. As well as supporting life-long health, adopting a healthy lifestyle gives you the best chance of conceiving and having a healthy pregnancy and a healthy baby. We provide evidence-based information on everything from sleep and exercise to hormones and gut health. Reliable scientific information underpins everything we do and helps you optimise your health and wellbeing.
Fertility Nutrition explains the dietary principles that are important for good fertility and when planning a pregnancy to give you the best chance of conceiving and having a healthy pregnancy and a healthy baby. It provides evidence-based information on what to eat and why good diet before pregnancy is so important for the future health of your child. Reliable scientific information underpins everything we do and helps you to get ready for pregnancy.
Eliran MorOur Reproductive Health guide empowers you with knowledge so you truly understand your body and ensure you are receiving the best medical treatment for any problems you may be experiencing. Good reproductive health is crucial for general health and taking positive action now lays the foundations for lifelong health. Reliable scientific information underpins everything we do and helps you take control of your wellbeing.
My Fertility Journey explains the important steps to take when planning a pregnancy to give you the best chance of conceiving and having a healthy pregnancy and a healthy baby. It provides evidence-based information to help prepare your body in the important months before conception. Reliable scientific information underpins everything we do and helps you go forward with confidence as you lay the foundations for the future health of your baby.
This section of The Fertility Guide provides essential information for when you experience prolonged difficulties conceiving, failed IVF, miscarriage or have absolute infertility due to age or other factors. We know this is a heart-breaking place to be and we hope that providing reliable, evidence-based information, it will make the journey a little easier and allow you to get the help you need.
All content on this site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Only those manuscripts which are original, have not been published elsewhere, and are not currently being considered for inclusion in another publication will be considered for publication in Fertility and Sterility®. Authors are advised to keep a copy of all manuscripts submitted.
All manuscripts will be evaluated by peer reviewers who will remain anonymous. Selection of the peer reviewers is at the sole discretion of the Fertility and Sterility® editors. The editors and reviewers do not disclose any information about a manuscript or its review. If revisions are required, authors are asked to return the revised manuscripts within 30 days for the first revision, and within 20 days for any subsequent revisions. Please notify the editorial office if additional time is needed or if you choose not to submit a revision.
Conditions of Authorship. Authors should have made significant conceptual, intellectual, experimental, and analytical contributions to the research, as well as having participated in writing and revising the manuscript. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for its content. Honorary authorship (i.e., not adhering to the conditions of authorship and, none-the-less, being granted authorship) is not permitted.
Responsibilities of Authors. Authors must describe the research in sufficient detail such that others could repeat it. Written, informed consent under protocols approved by an institutional or local review board or approved animal protocols are essential if the research involves human or animal subjects, respectively. This information should be stated in the manuscript and the protocol number or exempt status of approved protocols should be stated in the manuscript at the time of submission for review. Authors of clinical trials are required to prospectively register their trial with one of the ICMJE-recognized trial registries . Selective reporting of data is inappropriate, especially if unreported data are in disagreement with the findings of the selectively reported data. In accordance with the ICJME, the ASRM supports publication of negative studies. Authors should cite publications in the literature that are relevant to the uniqueness of the research and should including publications by others, as well as of their own research group. Previous publication of a preliminary report on the data is permissible, if this is stated clearly in a footnote in the manuscript.
For transparency, we require corresponding authors to provide co-author contributions to the manuscript using the relevant CRediT roles. The CRediT taxonomy (here) includes 14 different roles describing each contributor's specific contribution to the scholarly output. The roles are: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Roles/Writing - original draft; and Writing - review and editing. Note that not all roles may apply to every manuscript, and authors may have contributed through multiple roles. More details and an example.
Changes to authorship. Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor. To request such a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason for the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, letter) from all authors that they agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed.
Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors after the manuscript has been accepted. While the Editor considers the request, publication of the manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online issue, any requests approved by the Editor will result in a corrigendum.
Scientific Misconduct. The DHHS Office of Research Integrity defines plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification. The ASRM accepts these definitions and considers them to constitute scientific misconduct. Additional unethical behavior that comprises scientific misconduct includes: submission of results from animal or clinical research that was conducted without appropriate approval and written, informed consent; duplicate publication; and honorary authorship. Research misconduct occurs when results are falsified, fabricated or plagiarized. The actions are willful or intentional, although the actual definition of misconduct varies somewhat by country. This can occur at various times during the process of proposing, performing or reviewing research. Differences of opinion or honest errors do not constitute misconduct.
Plagiarism: Using another person's words, ideas, results, and processes without giving credit to them. Plagiarism includes the theft of intellectual property, ideas or methods such as the use of information gained by personal communication, or during a grant or manuscript review. Plagiarism also includes the direct textual copying of another person's work. Direct copying of 100-250 words constitutes plagiarism. Authorship disputes are not included in this definition. Citation plagiarism is the failure to credit others with prior discoveries and is extremely common. Self-plagiarism can include multiple publications of the same manuscript in different journals or books.
Salami Publications: Dividing data, analysis, and presentation into "minimally publishable units" is a slippery slope, and can be used to extend one data set over several manuscripts. While this may be acceptable for clarity of presentation and focus on specific outcomes in different manuscripts, a motivation may also be to increase the publication list in an author's CV. The latter is unethical and unacceptable. Therefore, please acknowledge in your cover letter any similar publications or submitted manuscripts.
Partial publication. Partial presentation of data in another medium (e.g., on a website) does not necessarily preclude publication in Fertility and Sterility, but acknowledgment of the previous presentation is required, along with identification of the source (e.g., the URL of the website). Content cannot be copied verbatim from the previous presentation, as that would constitute self-plagiarism, but must be rewritten to comply with journal standards.
Authors must declare the use of generative AI in scientific writing upon submission of the paper. The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process: